Don’t think Viewmodel will replace SaveInstanceState
Maybe some developer will excited about the
ViewModel when it can save the state, and someone will thinking to replace
ViewModel. After that you implement that you will get some mistake.
ViewModel will only preserve data
onConfigurationChange and when activity/fragment still processed and not get killed. So when you get state after activity get killed you should implement
ViewModel. So would you choose one of them or use both of them. actually
SavedInstanceState complete each other, such as overlap in capability but not as a subset or superset of the other. You still need both of that.
SaveInstancesState can kept the state
onConfigurationChanes, but only
SaveInstanceState do that although the activity get killed. So storing state when event activity or fragment is killed by system, you will need
ViewModel. or the other alternative you can use
ViewModel have the other capability that
SaveInstanceState dont have.
ViewModel can continue operation process that was already started before confguration change.
I will give some example, lets imagine when your device in portrait screen, and you try to request some API but you have poor connection, before the request complete you try to rotate your device into landscape, and look what happen. If you use
SaveInstanceState your current request will terminate first and then start the request again or restart the process. the other hand if you use
ViewModel, when you trigger configuration change the current process/request wouldnt terminated it will continue.
ViewModel can keep state when the activity/fragment still alive, and then it can continue current process after configuration change. While
SavedInstanceState can keep sate when activity/fragment alive or get killed, but the other hand when configuration change the current process will terminate and restart the process again.